• Login
    View Item 
    •   PAU Repository Home
    • PAUWES
    • PAUWES Master Thesis Series
    • Nexus Research
    • View Item
    •   PAU Repository Home
    • PAUWES
    • PAUWES Master Thesis Series
    • Nexus Research
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON GIS BASED METHODS AND MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHM IN LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MODELING, A case study of Bududa, Uganda

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Master Thesis _Roset NAMWANJE.pdf (8.268Mb)
    Date
    2021-11-15
    Author
    NAMWANJE, Roset
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Landslide susceptibility modeling is of critical importance to landslide risk management, urban planning, understanding landscape evolution, and identifying landslide spatial and temporal signatures. In this study, the GIS-based weight of evidence model and the Support Vector Machine learning algorithms were compared in landslide susceptibility assessments using a case study of Bududa located in the eastern part of Uganda. The inventory of landslides applied in the study was created using satellite imagery and historical maps of the region. The causative factors were derived from the STRM DEM of 30m resolution and the Geological characteristics of the region were obtained from the Ministry of Geological Survey and Mines. The Weight of Evidence model revealed 5 factors with a positive spatial association to landslide occurrences and these were the Slope Angle, Profile Curvature, Plan Curvature, Geology and Distance to Rivers. The SVM model identified Slope Angle, Profile Curvature, Stream Power Index and Elevation as triggering factors. The comparative analysis between the two methods was conducted using the Confusion Matrix, the Receiver Operating Curves (ROC) and the developed susceptibility maps. The ROC curves gave an accuracy of 87% of the Area under Curve (AUC) for the Optimizable Support Vector Machines and a 79% (AUC) for Weight of Evidence in performance. The field validation data placed ten landslide points in the mapped susceptibility zones for both models which indicated a good overall performance for both methodologies, however the study evinced potential of more efficient and accurate results with the integration of both approaches in landslide susceptibility modeling.
    URI
    http://repository.pauwes-cop.net/handle/1/492
    Collections
    • Nexus Research [3]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    My Account

    Login

    Browse

    All of PAU RepositoryInstitutes & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV