A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION SUPPORT FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: A CASE STUDY OF SOUK-AHRAS REGION - ALGERIA.

Abstract

This study assesses the sustainability of current water resources management practices in the region of Souk-Ahras in northeastern Algeria through an integrated approach. This approach combines survey investigation, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and SWOT analysis. Initially, the study evaluates sustainability dimensions of water resources management using a set of criteria and sub-criteria. AHP is then used to prioritize these dimensions, criteria, and sub-criteria based on their pairwise comparisons according to expert judgments. Results highlight the importance of political commitment, early warning systems, and water quality compliance in effective water resources management. Combining survey findings and AHP analysis reveals Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) in existing practices. Identified weaknesses include non-conforming water quality, inadequate water services, and funding insufficiency. In contrast, strengths comprise strong political will, significant women's participation, and affordable water services. Threats focus on drought, climate change, and agricultural impacts, while opportunities underscore effective wastewater repurposing. Overall, this study provided valuable insights for decision-makers and stakeholders to enhance water management policy and improve the sustainability of water resources in the region of Souk-Ahras.